Recently, I heard that a publisher is going to change the word “nigger” to “slave” in Huckleberry Finn, and my thought is that they missed the point. Mark Twain was controversial, heck, he still is; the fact that he didn’t want his autobiography published until 100 years after his death speaks to that. I think Twain had a better grasp of the controversy than the publishing house making the changes seems to think, and, by changing the words, the book will probably lose some of its impact. If people are so offended by a word that they won’t read a book because of it, than maybe those people should think about that, and what it says about them. (They also might not want to read the KJV of Deut. 23:2 for a different offensive word.) Starting down this road of censorship seems like a bad idea to me.
Another thing I heard about on the news was that the House of Representative’s reading of the Constitution left out the ‘slaves being counted as 3/5′ passage. It’s almost like they’re trying to rewrite history. It makes me wonder what else they left out, and what they’ll try to leave out as they write new laws. Beyond the fact that the people who wrote it were setting guidelines, I get the feeling that the people who pushed for the reading of it were mostly just trying to waste time. And leaving parts out seems to point to a selective view of history. Looking at how it was and how things have changed can be a valuable lesson. Ignoring history doesn’t make it go away.