I really didn’t address this aspect in my last post so I thought I do that now; I think the biggest problem I have with zero tolerance policies is that they don’t take the circumstances into account. No matter why people bring a knife into a school (or do something else that would infringe upon the policy) they would get the same punishment. It’s a lazy way to deal with things. It’s one thing if someone comes in brandishing a knife and threatening people; it’s a completely different thing if someone brings a knife to use it appropriately.
My oldest brother, who always has a pocketknife on him, has told me that one time in one of his high school classes he took out his knife to cut something that needed to be in one of his (I think ag) classes, and I don’t even think his teacher noticed. Of course, this was pre-Columbine, but not by too many years. But, if for some reason he’d gotten in trouble for it, I would hope that they would have taken into account that he used it properly and didn’t cause harm or threaten harm to anybody.
I mean really, someone could threaten someone else with their schoolbooks, that doesn’t mean everyone’s schoolbooks should be taken away. It means that if someone does that then that person should be punished accordingly. A knife, in and of itself, isn’t a threatening thing. We use them to prepare food; and we use them to help us eat food; we even use them to break down boxes and do other useful things. The presence of a knife isn’t, by itself, a threat. Even if it were, it would be a short-range threat. Sure, it could be thrown, but that would be as inaccurate as throwing a book. And either one would be punished. But, just bring a knife (especially some kind of utility knife), shouldn’t be punished as severely as threatening someone with a book.
One-size-fits-all-justice isn’t justice at all. There are mitigating and aggravating circumstances for a reason; intent is important. And such considerations shouldn’t just apply to kindergartener or first graders; the boy who brought the camping knife to school is getting an exemption of a kind because he’s so young, and the school district has lightened their policy for kindergartener and first graders, but only those two groups. I think they need to apply that to all grade levels. Maybe some kind of graduated policy, not just according to age, but also according to past record and severity of infraction. If someone doesn’t do anything wrong until senior year and that person is only involved in a minor infraction than that person should have a less sever punishment than someone who has multiple severe infractions, even if that second person is only in grade school. Like I said, let the punishment fit the crime.
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.